Posted by Andy Kerridge on September 29, 2011 at 18:49:43:
Hi,
I'm trying to calculate the dipole moment of NiH, which has been done previously using CASSCF (J. Chem. Phys. 101:4893, 1994). My CASSCF value is approximately 3D, in general agreement with the CASSCF value quoted in the paper of 3.1D. However, in the paper a refined value of 2.65 is obtained using CASPT2. My CASPT2 calculated value is essentially the same as my CASSCF one, in fact a little larger. I am using the DENSITY keyword in CASPT2, as recommended in the manual. Can someone explain why do I not see an improvement in my calculated value? I notice that the dipole moment is calculated using a perturbative approach in the paper, but my output gives an expectation value for the dipole moment. Is this the cause of the difference? I understand that FFPT can be used in order to obtain a perturbative result, but can anyone tell me how the calculation is actually performed?
Regards,
Andy