Posted by Evgeniy Gromov on June 25, 2008 at 19:43:36:
Dear All,
I have encountered an extraordinary occurrence in the CASPT2 energies for two different configurations of the same system. The data is the following:
1st configuration:
CASSCF energy:
S0 (ground) state: -1083.32199351
S1 (lowest excited) state: -1083.16358216
Multistate CASPT2 energy:
S0 (ground) state: -1085.56591537
S1 (lowest excited) state: -1085.45365823
2nd configuration:
CASSCF energy:
S0 (ground) state: -1083.25860324
S1 (lowest excited) state: -1083.19263076
Multistate CASPT2 energy:
S0 (ground) state: -1085.52232322
S1 (lowest excited) state: -1085.45281629
As you can see CASSCF predicts that the S1 state at the 2nd configuration is lower in energy than at the 1st configuration. Surprisingly CASPT2 does not agree with CASSCF and finds the S1 state higher in energy at the 2nd configuration. It is a priori known that S1 is lower in energy at the 2nd configuration!
The active space and all things are the same in all calculations, only the geometry is different.
I wonder why CASPT2 gives obviously a wrong result in this case. Has someone encountered the same behaviour?
Thanks!
Best,
Evgeniy